Nuclear Industry Pack

Nuclear Decommissioning Cost & Schedule Forecasting

Decommissioning forecasts fail differently to construction forecasts. The work is discovered rather than designed, the regulator gates progress, and the programme outlives the people who baselined it. The Nuclear pack forecasts on that basis.

How the engine works

Typical project-controls challenges in nuclear

The method is the same everywhere. These are the sector conditions that make a generic approach wrong, and what each one means for how you control the project.

Characterisation uncertainty dominates

You are forecasting the cost of removing material whose extent and activity you do not yet fully know. Early-phase estimates carry uncertainty ranges that would be unacceptable anywhere else, and a single-point EAC hides it entirely.

A point estimate is indefensible. You need a range

Regulatory hold points are not float

ONR permissioning, safety case acceptance and waste consignment approvals sit on the critical path but behave nothing like activities. They have no productivity rate and cannot be accelerated with resource.

CPM treats them as compressible. They are not.

Contingency drawdown over decades

A twenty-year programme holds contingency that must be released on an agreed profile. Forecasting against remaining contingency, not just remaining budget, is what the NDA and Treasury actually scrutinise.

Drawdown profile is a reporting requirement

Waste routes drive cost, not activity duration

Cost is dominated by waste stream, container count and disposal route, ILW versus LLW versus VLLW. Forecasting on labour hours alone misses the majority of the spend.

Cost per m³ by stream, not cost per man-hour

Baselines outlive their authors

Over a multi-decade programme, the assumptions behind the original estimate are lost unless they were recorded as data. Every forecast challenge becomes archaeology.

Undocumented assumptions cannot be defended

Which capabilities apply

Every tool below is a separate workbook that works on its own. These are the ones nuclear teams tend to reach for, and what each one answers.

Analyse

  • Whether the programme you were sent is built properly, before you rely on it
  • Where the critical path really runs, and how much float is protecting it
Schedule Quality Analyser

Control

  • Cost and schedule performance against the baseline, in CPI and SPI
  • Change and risk exposure on one register, not in email
The core suite

Forecast

  • Outturn cost and completion date as a range, not a single number
  • The contingency needed to be 80% confident, not 50%
Forecast Engine

Measure

  • Progress claimed against rules of credit rather than opinion
  • An update block you can paste straight back into P6
Progress Measurement System

Contract & claims

  • Whether a submitted programme meets NEC4 clause 31.2
  • Productivity loss measured against an unimpacted period
NEC4 Compliance Disruption & Productivity Loss

Sustainability

  • Capital carbon baseline and forecast against target
  • Evidence trail for PAS 2080 assurance
Carbon & PAS 2080

How it runs, month to month

  1. Export two tables from P6 or Microsoft Project. An activity list and a relationship list. Nothing in your scheduling tool changes.
  2. Paste them in. The shaded cells are the only inputs. Everything else is formula-driven.
  3. Check the programme is sound. The schedule quality scorecard runs the DCMA checks and tells you what to fix before you forecast from it.
  4. Enter the period progress and cost. Earned value, actual cost and planned value by period.
  5. Read the forecast and issue the report. CPI, SPI, EAC and the P50 to P80 range, with the assumptions recorded alongside them.

What's in the Nuclear edition

The engine is identical across industries. The edition supplies the content that makes it speak your sector's language, so it is useful the first time you open it rather than after a fortnight of setup.

WBS skeleton

  • Site characterisation & survey
  • Asset care & maintenance
  • Decontamination
  • Dismantling & size reduction
  • Waste packaging & consignment
  • Final site clearance

Cost codes

  • ILW / LLW / VLLW streams
  • Container types & counts
  • Disposal route & gate fees
  • Transport & shielding
  • PPE and RPE consumables

Risk register

  • Unexpected contamination found
  • Safety case rejection / rework
  • Waste route unavailability
  • Skilled RPS resource shortage
  • Extended care & maintenance

Regulatory milestones

  • ONR permissioning gates
  • Safety case submission & acceptance
  • Waste consignment approvals
  • Environment Agency permits
  • End-state definition sign-off

Worked example

Reactor building decommissioning, year 4 of 11

BAC £88M. To date: EV £27.4M, AC £31.2M, PV £29.1M. Characterisation has found 18% more contaminated concrete than the baseline assumed.

CPI
0.88
EAC (CPI-based)
£100M
P50 forecast
£103M
P80 forecast
£117M
The CPI-based EAC says £100M. The Monte Carlo says you need £117M to be 80% confident. On a programme with this much characterisation uncertainty, the gap between those two numbers is the conversation with your funder, and single-point forecasting hides it completely.

Illustrative figures, shown to demonstrate the method. Your numbers replace them.

Reports and outputs

Each of these is a sheet in the workbook. They recalculate when you enter the period progress, so there is nothing to assemble at month end.

Cost forecast

  • Three EAC methods side by side
  • CPI, SPI, cost and schedule variance
  • Variance at completion and TCPI

Monte Carlo

  • 1,000 iterations, no macros
  • P50, P80 and P90 outturn cost
  • Forecast duration and delay against baseline

Earned Schedule

  • Time-based schedule performance
  • Forecast completion date
  • Stays honest late in the job, unlike SPI

Cash flow and resources

  • Payment lag and retention modelled
  • Peak funding requirement
  • Resource forecast by period

Productivity

  • Trend against planned rate
  • Early warning before CPI moves

Assumptions and audit

  • Every distribution, its source and date
  • The record that defends the number

Nuclear questions

No. It forecasts outturn from progress you have already earned. Bottom-up estimating stays where it is. This tells you whether that estimate is still credible four years in.
Yes. Extended low-activity periods are modelled as fixed-rate holding costs rather than progress-earning work, so they do not distort CPI.
It forecasts at stream and container level, not item level. For a full radiological inventory you would keep your existing system and feed totals in.
The Assumptions & Audit sheet records every distribution, its source and the date it was set. That record is the defence, the number alone never is.

Other industry editions

Forecast nuclear with numbers you can defend

Nuclear Edition £349, all eight editions £999, complete suite £1,399